Sahrun, a hardworking and honest man, faced financial difficulties and was seeking ways to improve his economic situation. One day, he saw posters circulating in his village advertising an easy loan of Rs. 1,00,000, promising no hassle or upfront costs. Desperate to resolve his financial struggles, he contacted the number listed on the poster. The person on the other end assured him that the loan was legitimate but required an initial deposit of Rs. 2,100. Despite some reservations, Sahrun consulted Poonam, a rural fact-checker from the community, for advice. She warned him that the offer seemed suspicious, but Sahrun, trusting the promise of easy money, proceeded to send the deposit.
A few days later, Sahrun received another call from the same number, this time requesting an additional Rs. 2,100 for a “file charge.” At this point, Poonam, alarmed by the repeated demands for money, advised Sahrun to reconsider. She explained that legitimate financial institutions do not ask for upfront payments. However, when Sahrun tried to call the number again to request the return of his money, he found the phone switched off, and he realised he had fallen victim to a scam.
The fraud was carried out through a combination of phone calls and fake advertisements, which initially appeared legitimate. The scammers used traditional mobile communication to build trust with their victims, first by offering a small loan with an initial fee, then escalating demands for further payments under different pretexts. The fraudsters relied on social engineering tactics to manipulate vulnerable individuals like Sahrun, exploiting their lack of awareness about cyber fraud and their financial desperation. The method of execution was straightforward, involving phone calls and text messages, with no advanced technology or tools used beyond basic mobile communication.
For Sahrun, the financial and emotional impact of the fraud was significant. The money he paid was from his hard-earned savings, which he had intended to use to buy a new wheelchair. As a person with limited mobility, he depended on his family for transportation and had hoped that a better wheelchair would allow him to travel outside the village and continue his education. The scam not only deprived him of the money he had saved for this purpose but also left him feeling embarrassed and ashamed. He feared the loss of respect in his community, particularly because such financial misfortunes are often not openly discussed in rural areas, especially among men. This cultural stigma prevented him from confiding in his family about the loss, and he felt isolated in his shame.
The case also highlights the broader socio-economic and cultural challenges that contribute to such scams. In rural areas like Khedla, financial literacy and awareness of cyber security are often limited. Many people in these communities are unfamiliar with the risks associated with digital platforms, making them easy targets for fraudsters. In addition, prevailing social norms discourage open discussions about financial problems, particularly among women and vulnerable groups, who may fear the loss of autonomy and respect within their households. This lack of knowledge and openness creates an environment where cyber frauds can flourish unchecked.
Sahrun’s experience underscores the need for greater financial literacy and digital awareness in rural India. Programs targeting vulnerable groups, such as women and persons with disabilities, are crucial in equipping individuals with the skills and knowledge to recognise and avoid scams. Community-based information networks, like those involving rural fact-checkers, play a vital role in raising awareness and providing guidance on how to deal with fraudulent schemes. Poonam’s intervention was critical in helping Sahrun realise the fraud, and her advice to report the matter to the authorities was an essential step in addressing the situation.
Despite reporting the fraud to the local police, it remains uncertain whether the perpetrators were ever apprehended. This highlights a broader issue: while reporting cyber fraud is important, law enforcement agencies in rural areas often lack the resources and expertise to effectively handle such cases. More training and support for local police are needed to ensure that they can address cyber crimes in a timely and effective manner.
This case also points to the need for public awareness campaigns targeting rural populations. Government agencies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) should collaborate to raise awareness about digital frauds and educate people on how to protect themselves. Such campaigns should focus on the signs of fraudulent schemes, the importance of verifying offers before committing money, and how to report incidents of fraud to the authorities.
Sahrun’s story is a poignant example of how cyber fraud can exploit the vulnerabilities of rural communities, especially among individuals with limited financial and digital literacy. It illustrates the psychological and emotional toll of being defrauded, particularly when it involves the loss of money that was meant for a critical need, such as healthcare or mobility aids. This case study calls for urgent action to address the growing threat of cyber fraud in rural India and to provide vulnerable populations with the tools and knowledge they need to protect themselves from such scams. Only by improving financial literacy, expanding information networks, and enhancing legal and police support can we hope to mitigate the risks posed by digital fraud in these communities.
Leave feedback about this